The imminent evolution of quantum computing threatens the security and integrity of your data, and will soon be after your crypto encryptions.
Our smart contract wallet uses compact post-quantum signature schemes to safeguard assets from attacks by quantum computers.
An evolving eco system for your post-quantum secure assets. A home for your coins, NFT's and private keys that are actually yours.
The imminent evolution of quantum computing threatens the security and integrity of your data, and will soon be after your crypto encryptions. Elliptic curve cryptography is the Achilles heel of web3 and jeopardizes your ownership, privacy, and autonomy.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.
But quantum computing won’t have an upper hand at breaking a Lamport signature. Our smart contract wallet uses compact post-quantum signature schemes to safeguard assets from attacks by quantum computers. We deploy Lamport signature functions across all ETH and EVM blockchains to strengthen security, move funds, and create and manage tokens and currency.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.
The security of the elliptic curve depends on the difficulty of solving discrete and uncommon logarithm problems, which quantum computers can do easily. A better known, widely used public key cryptography method is RSA. RSA security rests on the difficulty of factoring large numbers, which quantum computers are also good at. For the current implementations, secp256k1 is easier to break with quantum computers than the commonly-used security benchmark, RSA-2048. RSA-2048 will likely break a few months after secp256k1. When we hear “quantum computers are good at factoring”, this is often in reference to breaking the security of RSA. For blockchains the equivalent statement is that “quantum computers are good at discrete logarithms”. The fact that there is more jargon involved may partially explain why the problem is not well known for blockchains.
Quantum computers were not considered to be likely built in the 21st century when secp256k1 was chosen as the signature method for Bitcoin in 2008. secp256k1 is one type of public key cryptography method (which is analogous to sharing an opened lock to a friend, who locks a message in a box and only you have the key to open the lock and read the message). A public key on the secp256k1 elliptic curve can be broken for its private key by Quantum Computers in less than a day. Our wallet upgrades/protects your ETH and EVM blockchains now so you don’t lose later.
Current quantum computers are very noisy, but are steadily getting less noisy as hardware improves. In the next 2 years, we’ll reach the point where experimental methods can use all those noisy qubits to encode “logical” qubits with even less noise. This exponential suppression of noise and errors is called “fault-tolerance”. In itself, this is not sufficient to break the current cryptography of blockchains, but is a complete prototype for future devices. There are few applications for those intermediate quantum computers other than validating simple quantum algorithms that can be replicated (at large cost) on classical computers. This regime is what we refer to as “early fault-tolerant experiments”. The larger and bigger devices that will be built subsequently are the ones that will become increasingly threatening for cryptography.
PG Measures threat and protects against it the wallet. Given the advancement of hardware roadmaps, milestones, and the resource requirements for breaking secp256k1, it can be estimated that quantum computers will be able to break blockchains by 2031-2033. We’ve deployed challenges to directly measure the progress of quantum computers at breaking the cryptography of blockchains to use this data to refine and calibrate our risk models. (measurement down on proofofquantum.com)
The security of the elliptic curve depends on the difficulty of solving discrete and uncommon logarithm problems, which quantum computers can do easily. A better known, widely used public key cryptography method is RSA. RSA security rests on the difficulty of factoring large numbers, which quantum computers are also good at. For the current implementations, secp256k1 is easier to break with quantum computers than the commonly-used security benchmark, RSA-2048. RSA-2048 will likely break a few months after secp256k1. When we hear “quantum computers are good at factoring”, this is often in reference to breaking the security of RSA. For blockchains the equivalent statement is that “quantum computers are good at discrete logarithms”. The fact that there is more jargon involved may partially explain why the problem is not well known for blockchains.
Sollicitudin massa maecenas purus adipiscing egestas natoque fringilla odio ac sodales
Sollicitudin massa maecenas purus adipiscing egestas natoque fringilla odio ac sodales
Sollicitudin massa maecenas purus adipiscing egestas natoque fringilla odio ac sodales
Sollicitudin massa maecenas purus adipiscing egestas natoque fringilla odio ac sodales
Sollicitudin massa maecenas purus adipiscing egestas natoque fringilla odio ac sodales
Sollicitudin massa maecenas purus adipiscing egestas natoque fringilla odio ac sodales
Sollicitudin massa maecenas purus adipiscing egestas natoque fringilla odio ac sodales
Sollicitudin massa maecenas purus adipiscing egestas natoque fringilla odio ac sodales
Sollicitudin massa maecenas purus adipiscing egestas natoque fringilla odio ac sodales
Protect your assets from the regret of hindsight with our (quantum-proof) smart contract wallet.
Quantum-resistant signatures are the future of secure blockchain. Download your code now.
Simply minting your smart contracts future-proofs your blockchain assets seamlessly, invisibly, and quickly by anchoring your signature on the blockchain.
Your keys are your property and will remain that way. No one can access your info, you can’t access theirs, period.
You only need one physical wallet, and the same goes for your digital one.
What IBM has to say
What Amazon has to say
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.